The Dangers of Objectification :: Philosophy essays

The Dangers of Objectification   Consider for a moment the course typically taken in a class discussion. A person states that he is an egoist, or a relativist, or an absolutist. These various terms are used to banish an individualist according to his moral philosophy. Nietzsche has an important objection to these simplistic definitions. Shall we stable speak this flair today? May we do so? (Nietzsche 463) in that respect are difficulties in this simplistic approach to classifying an individual. The first is that an individual is non so easily crammed into a verbal box. Sartre would show that this is a way of objectifying the person under consideration. To say that I am an egoist, or that another(prenominal) student is an altruist, is to imply that egoism or altruism is the essential record of the person, and that other considerations fade into the background and become unimportant under this kill of the persons ethical philosophy. It is to equate me with egoism, or to equate the other student with relativism.   merely I am more than Bob the egoist I am also Bob the philosopher, I am Bob the student, I am Bob the coffee drinker. The name Bob points to a definition that is, of necessity, abbreviated. When a stranger asks me who I am, it is not possible for me to provide a ace description. notwithstanding when I describe a few opinions, actions, and relationships, I do so hoping that she may view me beyond the narrow limits imposed by what I can tell her quickly.   It may be convenient to say, But for this discussion we consider only your ethical theory. But besides objectifying the individual, this is as well simplistic because it ignores the subtle shades of meaning which exist among these philosophies. I echo of myself as an egoist because I believe that the very nature of an individual grants him certain rights and that these rights do not include claims on the rights of another. But to say that I am an egoist is to imply that I agree, completely or mostly, with the ethical theories of Hobbes, Rand, and every other egoist who has ever philosophized--none of which is overwhelmingly true, since I differ with all of the egoists I am acquainted with. For example, the popular world of egoism implies that I think it is morally acceptable to perform whatsoever action to achieve my ends, regardless of the effect on others.