Perserving Nature, Perserving Us Essay

When John Berger suggests, It is inside this bleak natural context that truelove is encountered, and the encounter is by its personality sudden and unpredictable (Berger 92) he establishes that correct though there be rargon flakes of smasher found in genius, none of them are permanent. He goes further to explain that these moments of yellowish pink are examples of art Art is an organized response to what personality anyows us to glance occasionally (Berger 94). This suggests that temper is only pleasing when these infrequent flashes are captured in art. For example, the idea of the white bird that Berger discusses in his essay is taken from temper and is molded into a delicate, precious handmade piece.When the real bird is mentioned in his essay he says, Outside, in minus 25C, the real birds are freezing to death (Berger 94). His surfacelook on nature is portrayed as beastly. Only the idea of the white bird sculpture is charming to him. though the suffering bird is nt the some appealing thought it is nature, it is real. He is referring to his idea that within these bleak natural contexts, beauty is encountered. of beauty, how can these population continue to be so dedicated with preserving nature?It is advocated that nature is consistently beautiful alone. These organizations and groups are devoted to preserving and allowing nature to be beautiful permanently. homogeneous Berger says art is the permanence of natures beauty, the goal of these people is to vary the art, or the instant of beauty into an endless aesthetic. A picturesque moment in the eyes of Berger is instants that provoke aesthetic emotion. These brief seconds in time portray hopefulness within nature.He says that by organizing these hopeful and beautiful moments in time, art is therefore formed. Art by definition is any of versatile pursuits or occupations in which creative or imaginative skill is utilize according to aesthetic principles (OED). These moments are found so sparingly because nature is and pull up stakes always be uncertain.Even in todays gentlemans gentleman with all the technology, we are still not prepared for the ira of nature, let alone to fathom how harsh or when these unstable moments allow for arise. The idea Berger offers that nature solely has brief periods of beauty supports my question of why people search so hard to preserve nature itself. straightaway people are involved withenvironmental programs much(prenominal) as Greenpeace and recycling, all with the same goal of trying to preserve and save the future of our planet. If Bergers point of view is that nature only has a certain terminus of beauty, how can these people continue to preserve nature? We memorise beauty all around us. It starts right here at home.Being a student at NYU its customary to walk through chapiter uncoiled Park each day. While in the park we see many forms of art. The question arises that why in an urban city do we have parks? We have an assortment of parks, from central park to unification Square Park and many more through out the city. puff up the logic behind having these parks is that they portray beauty in the virtually desolate areas. After a long day of being locked up in classes, the only thing that acts as an outlet from classes and school is sitting in Washington Square Park. The park not only acts as an escape, but it allows one to find peace within the stressful and disorganised city.When I am in the park I can crown my mind as well as be one with nature. constitution is beautiful. Nature or these parks leave alone always be beautiful even in the winter. How many times have you seen pictures of Washington Square Park with snow covered benches, and the frozen fountain, and it still be the closely breath-taking scene? The community and these organizations thrive on upholding, and protecting parks such as these. It is because of people like this, people who care, people who see beauty where it may not be all the time is why nature and these parks are aesthetic. Ann Zwinger, the author of A Desert World allegorizes the prototype that nature holds.Her core ideas of endurance, empathy, and anguish that each grain of sand holds present her reason for constructing this essay. Nature gives us a certain consideration for how the human being cultivates itself and how it has fashioned our daily lives. Zwigger views the most desolate environment as beautiful and hopeful. Similarly, Bergers essay implies that natures beauty comes and goes whereas Zwinger makes it clear that nature always demonstrates beauty and stories.She furthers her thinking by clarifying, I tally the physiological ad safements of blood and urine, hearing and seeing, of adaptations in behavior that make life in the desert not only possible with verve, qualities seen and unseen that spell out not only survival, but survival with zest (Zwigger 416).These things that survive in nature are not hardly getting by, but still they flourish because of innovation forced upon them when evolution occurs. It is important to remember how the orbitcame to be signifying the optimism of aesthetics, and yet there is still an immense area for development. The mussiness of a visually appealing landscape is irreplaceable, but also a memorandum of where we come from. If we take a step back and try and interpret what Zwinger is trying to say, she is saying beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. To me what may be beautiful is the opposite of what Zwinger thinks.She views the cave and the desert to be the most beautiful thing. However, to me I find the sparkling waters in the Caribbean only spectacular. As she finds the ability of animals to survive and evolve in the desert to be beautiful and intriguing, comparably, I find these sea creatures to be the same. The amount of oceanic life that is flourishing that we dont even know nearly is not only unfathomable but is beautiful. Even the unknown of nature is b eautiful. Damien Hirst perfectly depicts art that is nature frozen in time besides to the concept that John Berger discusses in his essay.Hirsts series The exsanguinous Cube, are these simple, transparent glass boxes with motionless animals inside them. These animals are not just examples, but they are natures beauty captured by art. This explicitly illustrates my thoughts on the biggest contrasts between how Berger views nature and my own views. I feel that by capturing these moments they become stuck or full of tension. Moreover, Hirsts art educate can are arguably not be beautiful in that life cannot be seen in these still pieces of art. On the other hand, to further my thinking, Zwinger may view his work to imprison nature.These freely roaming creatures are now fixed. The question posed in this essay was why do we preserve nature? I commit that nature is kept preserved because if we do not uphold nature, we will not be alive. There are many things in this world that we take f or granted, nature being one of them. Even Berger describes nature as being energy and struggle he goes further to articulates, Nature has no promises. Berger fully understands the delicacy of nature but he fails to recognize its general beauty. Furthermore I think that from natures beauty earthly concern can learn about themselves.An example of this can be hunting. cosmos hunt for animals, however hunting teaches you a lot more then(prenominal) just how to shoot a gun. Hunting teaches you how to be patient. It teaches you to respect and to be thankful. Hunting is a form of nature. It is a way of life that happens within nature everyday. If we keep these positive attributes of nature in mind we will want to preserve the wilderness. The more we look into why wekeep nature around the more we can learn about ourselves.Works CitedBerger, John. The White Bird. The Sense of Sight. NY Vintage, 1993. 5-11.Zwinger, Ann. A Desert World. Trans. Array Occasions for Writing- Evidence, Idea, E ssay. Boston, MA Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2008. 415-416. Print.