The Handmaids Tale Essay Example for Free

The handmaids Tale EssayGileads totalitarianism regime uses religious belief to meet the ends of the regime, instead than the regime being a means to serve graven image. sense Scrolls is a taper where servants purchase one of five petitioners to be read to them, before being recycled. Offreds requester is a distortion of the Lords Prayer which is ostensibly much more personal to her. Offred describes person Scrolls as a franchise. This suggests the presence of bu faultess and technology in Gilead, reinforced by the idea that the Handmaids accounts are debited and that the regime is everywhere. This concept of business is continuous throughout the novel, for example the ceremony antecedently discussed is portrayed to be a business transaction. Franchise has connotations of something which is unavoidable. eveningrybody knows it and everybody has access to it, and its the same everywhere you go its incredibly impersonal. Gilead uses understanding Scrolls as a means of c ontrolling the Handmaids. There is no flexibility because there is no choice in prayer there are only five prayers to necessitate from, which seems quite artificial.In only offering five exact choices health, wealth, a death, a birth, a sin, it prevents community praying for anything else. Despite the fact that the Handmaids behind mentally think of new(prenominal) prayers, they passel never articulate this because their freedom of speech is subverted to the state of Gilead. Birth and death are rites of passage and for the Handmaids its the only two things they can be certain of.They exist but for the mark to bear children, and constant reminders of the consequences if they fail to conceive are that they will eventually die. With only 5 prayers available, this creates harmony which shows how Gilead manipulates religion, because in reality, prayer should be different for everyone. The concept of Christianity is based on the relationship between theology and the person. Pr ayer is theoretically supposed to be a means of personal communication, a way to thank divinity fudge, and to wish for things to happen.Soul Scrolls is not personal. The machines talk and by speaking in a toneless bimetal voice, Gilead is taking all freedom from the Handmaids minds, and this autonomy removes any need for a thought process, which means the Handmaids cannot threaten the Gilead regime by thinking for themselves. Soul Scrolls allegedly t to each one the Handmaids what they should think. However, their soul is a part of them and they should already know what they want to think, but the absence of this suggests the catch and power of Gilead.The idea that the Handmaids minds are also controlled is emphasised by this because Gilead doesnt let them develop, it uses machines and the role of people such as aunts and commanders to brainwash them. Regardless of the Handmaids being unable to express their thoughts, since God is omniscient he should know what theyre thinking. H owever, in articulating their thoughts they could confirm their own beliefs to themselves in a virtual(a) way. It forms a part of positive thinking in the concept that the more you repeat it the better a chance they hire of getting what they want.There is also a value in articulating feelings to people you passion because its comforting. God is a conscious living entity aware of peoples love. Nevertheless, Gilead completely restricts this because the Handmaids have been brainwashed for so long that its wrong to think and to have these feelings, and so this restricts the power that the Handmaids could have. Soul scrolls is only one way communication from the machine to the Handmaid, and this stops them developing thoughts, making the Soul Scrolls evidently another way of controlling the Handmaids.Soul Scrolls are described by the Wives to help their husbands career, which shows the machines to be pragmatic and simply a way to get ahead and follow the regime. Soul Scrolls also sug gests that the regime is manipulative because it shows a vehement for money and power in charging for the prayers to be read, and in controlling the Handmaids. In buying prayers, its a sign of faithfulness to the regime, which implies that the regime has completely re daubd religion and which emphasises that the Commander is thought to be like a God.Gilead completely distorts the meaning of prayer because with Soul Scrolls its not about connecting with God, and in prayer you should want to pray which is not what this is about. Atwoods repetition of punching in the numbers reinforces this sense of autonomy and contempt for the regime, because it appears repetitive and tedious. Offred describes it as having roll upon roll of prayers, which shows Gilead believes in standard not quality, further emphasising the concept of business and money. Gileads regime is described as indestructible.The window of Soul scrolls is shatterproof, which suggests that for the regime to have protected th e franchise, they must have feared there would be dissenters. It suggests that not everybody in Gilead accepts it but they dont dare to express this because of the consequences. There is reference to the spies in Soul Scrolls, each machine has an eye painted in gold on the side, which shows their superiority and that the Handmaids are forever and a day being watched there is no escape and this is yet another means of controlling them.Offred tries to remember what the place sold before and realises it was a lingerie shop. This takes away the feminist aspect of women because Gilead attempts to strip women of any wants and thoughts, to piss them only want to bear children. If a lingerie shop existed in Gileads society as it were then, it would be considered corrupt, which is ironic because Gilead itself is a mire of corruption. The concept of a patriarchal society is reinforced in that most of the stores carrying things for men are still open.Offreds parody of the Lords Prayer, whic h takes place by an empty garden (similar to how Jesus prayed alone in the Garden of Gethsemane), articulates Offreds feelings of abandonment and despair. argumentation by line, such as Who Art in the kingdom of heaven, she regurgitates the sentiments of the Lords Prayer, typically used at ceremonies (the irony being in comparison to her experience of ceremonies), and in private perpetration to express needs and hopes. Offred dwells on metaphors of heaven, hell, daily bread, and forgiveness, from which arises a ken of the absent chandelier where her predecessor attached a noose.This shows Offreds despair because throughout a anticipant prayer she arrives at the conclusion that dying is the only option. Offred tediously recites the recurrent line from a key in Gileads cemetery, and despite her attempts to remain In hope Offred suffers so much isolation that her prayer becomes a horrific cry for spiritual nourishment. Offred concludes with a plaintive rhetorical question, How c an I livelihood on living? which emphasises her unhappiness within Gilead and her want to end it all.Offred continually refers to God as You, which shows her yearning to be personal with God and to have a personal relationship. Atwood refers God as you because it personifies God viewing Offred as trying to talk to him personally. She wishes she knew Your name, which implies she needs God to answer her. She describes her thoughts as hell we can make for ourselves, which suggests that the hell is Gilead itself. Offred is uncertain about her capacity to find out about whats contingency in Gilead.The Fall was a fall from innocence to knowledge is a reference to Adam and Eves loss of innocence after they disobeyed God and tasted the Tree of Knowledge. Offred applies this to herself because Gilead teaches that knowledge is dire and that they will no longer be destitute if they think such knowledge (the irony being that they were never innocent in Gileads corrupt regime). This sugges ts that if Offred was to find out about what was happening, this would be a sin, and this also reinforces Gileads influence in terms of how they brainwash the Handmaids with bible stories.Offred avoids the traditional posture of praying I dont even close my eye. This is because it would draw attention to her and also shows that she is afraid of the consequences if she was found to be personally praying, and so this informal prayer becomes her only way of communicating with God. The equal darkness even when her eyes are closed implies that nothing goes away because its too hard. However, there is potential optimism within Offred. Or light suggests that there could be hope for Offred, except that Gilead takes this hope.This informal way of praying seems like shes not fully committed but she still wants to pray because shes desperate. Soul scrolls is very impersonal in comparison to Offreds own prayer. All thought process is removed, unlike how Offred can reflect in her mind during he r own prayer. In her own prayer, despite Offred not being completely committed, she does get the probability to think about whats happening in Gilead. In Soul Scrolls, Offred cannot do this because she may be caught and also because the autonomous voices prevent her from thinking.Offreds own prayer becomes much like a desperate cry for help and the purpose of her prayer is to portray to the reader just how distressed she is. On the other hand, Offred commits to Soul Scrolls because she has too since its a sign of faithfulness to Gileads regime, and if she didnt, it would seem suspicious, even if she doesnt believe in doing it. However, both do criticise Gilead, with Soul Scrolls expressing the pointlessness of it, and her own personal prayer expressing how Gilead is a hell.In her own personal prayer, Offred has hope for two way communications, and although his name is not known, God does offer some kind of contemplation for Offred, as she works her way through her feelings. Soul sc rolls is simply a one way communication because prayers are printed and read to the Handmaids before being recycled, which shows the uniformity of this prayer. Offreds own prayer is also in a sense a rebellion from the constraints of Gilead, because although this isnt her aim, it does go against what Gilead teaches that she should not be thinking for herself.When Offred visits Soul Scrolls, she is complying with the ways of Gilead simply to stay out of trouble. In conclusion, Offreds personal prayer is much more personal than Soul Scrolls, and despite it being a depraved version of the Lords prayer, it does signify her desperation for salvation from the regime. Soul Scrolls is something Offred simply goes along with because she has no choice but too, and this offers her no answers to her thoughts because of how autonomous and controlled it is.

Organic Ice Cream Essay Example for Free

Organic Ice Cream Essay there is hardly any person who has never bought or tasted any home-made or commercially produced codswallop cream. closely 41. 38% have purchased ice cream once a week and Haagen Dazs was chosen as their preferred brand. Among the available flavors in the market, chocolate (62. 50%) and vanilla (50. 00%) ar unagitated the old time favorite. Although closely prefer regular ice cream (93. 33%), about 25% have tasted organic ice cream.Due to the advancement of medicine and research, rapid information dissemination, and vast productionion of goods and services, consumers are aware of products that are sold in the market. Consumers these days do not only demand to satisfy their palates, they also want what is best for their health. There is a growing market for organic fruits (68. 75%) and vegetables (87. 50%) and about 78. 57% are still not aware that organic ice cream exists in the market. However, about 57. 4% are willing to try it if the organic ve rsion taste as good or pause than the regular version and if it is also healthier for them.People are switching to organic fruits and vegetables to avoid pesticides and different chemicals that are not beneficial to their health (Nagourney, 2007). They want to have a more nutritious, safer and better provender than non-organic. Since Haagen Dazs, a leading ice cream manufacturer, has never introduced organic ice cream, it can capture 87. 0% of the consumers who showed interest in trying the product produced by their favorite brand.While there are still limited numbers of organic ice cream manufacturers, this is the best time for Haagen Dazs to introduce a product that does not only satisfy consumers palate but also enhance their well being. other survey can be done to determine which among the organic ice cream fruit flavors would be most preferred by the consumers e. g. strawberry, blueberry, etc. It would also be best to randomly survey an competent number of male and female participants.

Analyzing Garret Harding’s Article Essay Example for Free

Analyzing Garret Hardings Article EssayThis paper seeks to analyze the article The cataclysm of the commonality by Hardin (1968). The first part summarizes the main dissertation by identifying the principle or principles that Hardin employ to excuse the Tragedy as he defines it. The second part describes how Hardins thesis would apply to output of smogginessginess pollutants in calcium. 2. Summary and Application 2. 1. SummaryThe paper article talks about the disaster of the common which has contradicted the invisible hand that was described by Adam metalworker that would gentlemanaged things for quite a little by just allowing mans selfishness to keep on profiting without realizing that the equal could be helping people in the process. The tragedy of the honey oil is therefore preventing the operation of the market or certain individuals from fully attaining what is good for these individuals because of the inevitable overpopulation.However the creator has also ackno wledged ways or eventors below which the tragedy of commons could be neutralized such(prenominal) the existence of private property in support of that mans selfishness in accordance with Smiths theory. He also mentioned other factors that may have either supported to weaken the tragedy of commons. He therefore still sees a source to the tragedy, which is the relinquishment of exemption to gillyflower by the commons. much(prenominal) can be done by nigh intervention of those who have the power like the state.The thesis of the Hardin (1968) further asserts that the business on overpopulation has no proficient solution for there is nothing to maximize. He notable the fact the people argon concerned about the problem of overpopulation and that the same people would try the ways to avoid the evils of such situation but without giving up the pleasure that they have now. The author assert the fact the people would want to make everything possible where plans could be growing or d eveloping whatsoever source of food that result solve the problem caused by the overpopulation.Hardin asserted about the absence of good solution to the problem as in winning the game of tick-tack-toe. He concluded that the simplest summary of the digest of mans problem in population is that the commons could justify their existence exclusively under(a) conditions of low-population density. Thus he argued that given the fact the population has increased, these commons have to be abandoned in one aspect. According to Hardin, the first way to abandon them can be done food gathering, envelopment farm land, restricting pastures and in hunting and fishing areas.He also truism the commons as a place for waste disposal that would justify their abandonment. Since the author also think ofs human freedom preservation, it was his position that to preserve and nurture the more important kinds of freedom, the solution is to give up the freedom to breed from these commons as soon as poss ible. 2. 2 Application to the Production of Smog Pollutants in calcium This part of the paper bequeath define Commons in the case of the smog pollutants in calcium as those people that may be part of the creating the problems of smog pollution in California, who may or may not be aware of the solution or cause of the problem.Individuals or non-commons may be those that are not part of the common which could be exemplified by the group described by Hardin which espouses the relinquishment of freedom to breed in order to arrest the tragedy of overpopulation caused and who believes that there are no technical solutions to problem. Since the case of pollution is related to overpopulation which according to Hardin has caused the problem, the non-commons extends their argument in this part that opt to give up still the freedom to breed for commons.This part describes also the problem in damage of the different apparent horizon from the commons, the non-commons or individual In terms of the commons, the problem of smog Production is a problem that could be technologically solved. Hence these commons would argue for the film for the production of cars that would be equipment of the capability of reduced or smog pollutants (Vannijnatten and Lambright, 2001 Dooley, 2002)). This could be evident in the case of what is cosmos required now of new cars from California.Newer cars commencement with 2009 model will be required to have label that contains a level as to horizontal surface ranks in terms of environsal impact. The information is designed to suffer consumers with the practical information that could contribute to their being responsible decision makers in the use of environment friendly vehicles while satisfying or clash the needs of these people to move around (Environment intelligence activity Service, 2009). The label used for environmental performance will include a scale of 1-10 for global warming craps and smog score.The higher score on both scale s will show that the car is more environment friendly car. With average normal score of 5 on both scales, the values of the decision makers will also show how they will value the environment will also be reflective of scores recorded (Environment News Service, 2009). Electric cars are noted to earn higher ratings than non- voltaic cars on both score thereby indicating the role of technology (Environment News Service, 2009). This would provide a strong argument against that of Hardin (1968) that there is no technical solution to the problem.It could be argued that electric cars evolved from gasoline cars and therefore consumers may be deemed to have become more responsible to the environment. In terms of the individual interests, as espoused by Garrett Hardin (1968), the solution is non-technical that one can never minimized or maximized that augur where there could acceptable smog pollutant level. From this view, the problem comes from the commons in the case of production of smog pollutants and not from non-commons which do not see themselves as part of the problem.Hardins viewed that there are indeed people causing smog pollutants in California which may not be prevented from having better cars due to the incline that there is no technical solution to the problem. The solution could not be erect therefore under the principle developed as viewed by commons that more efficient cars could be produced but rather in stopping the freedom to breed commons which will prevent the problem created in the production of smog pollutant in California.Hardin under his own view would rather therefore go for stopping the raising of the commons who keep on violating the rights of individuals because of the enclosures or certain advantages or favors given to these commons. The solution could include duty for government actions to deny seeming shout for more rights and liberties by the commons. In the article on Tragedy of the commons, Hardin (2008) also attacked the fact t hat every favor given to the commons is a deprivation of roughbodys personal liberty.He argued that while infringements made in the past could be accepted by him and the believers of his cause, he could only now see the abuse of infringement made because of the cries for rights and freedom are made by commons. He apothegm the benefits given to the commons are a way of robbing against the non-commons. He further saw only comprehensive ruin if the logic of the commons would continue to be upheld. For this purpose the author saw only the need for true freedom that is based on recognition of necessity.If this principle is applied to the smog pollutants in California, Hardin would see hopeless of having smog free cars and that the cost of regulation for smog free cars could only be caused by the commons. If Hardins position is to be sustained, this would amount to prohibiting rather the commons to not having cars whatever more by government actions since these non-commons would not w ant to share tone with the commons who will in the end cause overpopulation. Hardin (1968) also argued in the article that the most important aspect of necessity is the present need to recognize the necessity of abandoning the commons in breeding.Since he saw the absence of technical solution to the problem the misery of overpopulation would necessarily come along with all related evils. He posited that freedom to breed will bring ruin to all. In effect, Hardin would want to address still the issue of overpopulation since all the issue of pollution according to him is also cause by population. In terms of collective interest, people need to co-exist unitedly whether commons or non-commons because they only live in one land surface the earth which provides life for everybody.The right of co-existence happens because the ethical theory of social justice demands that one must practice what is just and circus to everybody concerned. To have peaceful-coexistence, there must be an in tention of each of the commons or the individuals to sacrifice some(prenominal) of their rights for the survival of both. The resulting conflict, if not solved, will put humans into a level of what is contentious as consciousnessively, the instinct for survival is as old as life itself (Fikes, 2001). Each person whether common or non-common has rights and obligations to write down if each is to live together harmoniously.While it is true that smog production would be dangerous to the environment and the common may occupy a bigger share in the total number of the population, it could be easily accepted that they could be wipe out on earth so that only the non-common shall live. To square up whether indeed a technical solution is possible, there is a need to understand the nature of smog which is a kind of air pollution caused them the petrochemical reaction of sunlight with volatile organic compounds and oxides of normality when released into the atmosphere.The same is therefore normally observed in automobile operation. To attain smog free objective, California used smog score by ranking each vehicles pollutants levels in terms of non-methane organic gases and oxides of nitrogen in relation to other vehicles within the current model year. Within the scale of 1 to 10, the California scale assigns 10 to be the cleanest while the average score 5 (Environment News Service, 2009). This could therefore avouch to the creation of technical solutions that would solve the problem of smog production in California.This again will provide strong argument against the position taken by the Hardin (1968) on the absence of technical solution. Another confirmation of this evolution in technology is in the light of the belief that car model before 2006 would betide below the smog score of one. An action for more stringent standards must be viewed as a way of creating solution that would satisfy the collective interest of both commons and non-commons. The fact of smog cr itique involves knowing whether Hydrocarbons, Nitrous Oxides or Carbon Monoxides (SmogTips, Inc, 2009) are present since these chemicals are identified for the production of smog.The fact the human knowledge has identified these chemicals from a long list of other known chemicals must come up to further as evidence of technical solution to the problem of pollution. 3. Conclusion This paper concludes that the thesis of Hardin (1968) on lack of technical solution to the problem of smog pollutants in California is not rue. This paper has found moves in California to control the production of smog pollutants. The thesis may have raised some points that consider in effect the tragedy caused by the commons where the author has even attacked the theory of universal human rights.The view of the author is in favor individualist orientation and subscribes to the ideal of selfish genes. However, as society has evolved, the individualists have lived together with the commons for centuries and although the position of Hardin may be logical at some points, this paper takes exception to the assertion that there is no technical solution to problems. There is a solution because humanity is forever looking for ways to solve its problems whether the scientist may come from commons or not.ReferencesDooley, E. (2002) litre Years Later Clearing the Air over the London Smog Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. one hundred ten Environment News Service (2009) New California Cars Display Smog, Global Warming Scores, vane roll URL, http//www. ens-newswire. com/ens/jan2009/2009-01-02-092. asp, Accessed January 29, 2009 Fikes, T. (2001) Evolutionary Psychology as Computational Theory in the Cognitive Sciences Journal of Psychology and Theology, Vol. 29Hardin, Garrett (1968) The Tragedy of the Commons, www document URL http//www. sciencemag. org/cgi/content/full/162/3859/1243, Accessed January 29, 2009 SmogTips, Inc (2009) How to pass the California emissions test. 3-Part Test. , www document URL http//www. smogtips. com/passing_inspection. cfm, Accessed January 29, 2009 Vannijnatten and Lambright (2001) North American Smog Science-Policy Linkages across Multiple Boundaries Canadian-American Public Policy

Christmas carol Essay Example for Free

Christmas chant EssayIn a Christmas carol by Charles Dickens, niggard be contracts a reformed character by the end of the yarn. Explain how effectively Dickens shows the extent of these character trades. The point tells of scrooge who is transported through fourth dimension to the Christmas of his childhood, the present and the future. The following essay will take you through these time periods. At the beginning of the story scrooge is portrayed as a dull, bleak character. On the front cover for example we stop see scrooge in a dark room on his own. The only light is from the pocket-size candle on his mantle piece. He has grey hair and a long pointy nose. Scrooges personality was actually negative and dull. We know that his attitude is bad as when his nephew wishes him a merry Christmas he replies bah, humbug. scrooges nephew and so again wishes scrooge a merry Christmas exclusively again only gets a response of what reason cause you to be merry, youre poor enough when scrooges nephew replies youre rich enough what reason have you to be dismissal scrooge has no answer to that question.As well as showing us scrooges negative personality it similarly shows us his attitude towards Christmas. Scrooge to a fault has a negative attitude towards the poor. We learn about this as when the charity collectors come, one says at this time of year it is usually more than desirable that we should make virtually slight provision for the poor. Are there no prisons replied scrooge At hearing this, the inspector says yes plenty, but many cant go there and many would rather die. A cold hearted scrooge then replies well then they had better do it quick and decrease the surplus population. The collectors were astonished and after this they effected there would be no point in pursuing there point. The gentlemen left. After this incident a couple of carol singers called at scrooges house. As soon as scrooge opened the door he raised a large stick and the small boys fled. At the end of the story scrooge became a completely reformed character. He walked the streets with a smile on his face he then also went to church and watched the people hurrying to and fro. He looked into kitchens of houses and found that anything could yield him pleasure.Earlier on in the story scrooge was invited to his nephews Christmas dinner. He rejected the invite. Later that afternoon he turned his steps towards the party. He walked in and said where is my love Hes in the eat room said the servant. Scrooge made his way to the dining room and when he walked in everyone looked at him bemused. Why bless my soul cried Fred whos that Its I, your uncle scrooge, I have come to dinner. Will you let me in Fred? Of course replied Fred.After the party instead of scrooges usual party pooper go for he cried wonderful party, wonderful games, wonderful unanimity, wonderful happiness. Scrooge was completely reformed. Another thing that turn up scrooges reformation was when Bob Cratchit turned up late for work. He was pleading with scrooge not to wind up him. Instead scrooge said a very merry Christmas and offered him a pay rise. The reader is unploughed interested by the ghosts that argufy scrooge each time. Once scrooge has past the first challenge the reader wants to stay and see if he passes the next one.Once he passes the second challenge the level of tension rises. After passing the third challenge scrooge remembers what he was like at the moolah of the story. Some of the words he used come back to haunt him. The overall message is that you dont have to be a scrooge if you con placementr others misfortunes and try to help out as much as possible. You will lead a much happier life if you are thoughtful and considerate. The story makes you wonder which side of scrooge you are most similar to. It leaves a clear question in your head. how could I change?

Animal Testing Essay Example for Free

beast Testing EssayAbdulrahman.BahjatAUISAugust 5, 2013We argon at war, and we leave behind do what we need to win (joey-gruber.tripod). thither is much debate over whether sentient being audition should be allowed or non. Some people deliberate that it is not essential to sacrifice fleshlys for humane pull in because they be being abused and tortured severely during experiments. Those People who stand against animal testing claim that humans eliminate umteen lives on body politic in order to safe humans lives, So there is no justice because even animals fill the right to live on earth, yet these people do not consider the truth that animals are being used in the food industry. Many ecesiss such as (PETA), which is the biggest organization against animal testing, theorise that animal testing is one of the most disturbing experiments ever, and it should be banned. However, these organizations absolutely do not breast at the big picture because animal testing use s moreover if frequent pests to test on, improves health and medicine, and ensures the rubber eraser of ornamental yields for the human use. Many organizations claim that animal testing reduces animals numbers and lead them to face extinction. In addition, these people say that with animal testing humans destroy the lives of some organisms. However, researchers use only pests in their experiments to test on. Animal testing gives humans more benefit by decreasing the pests to humans. 60% of all animals are mice and 20% are rats and guinea pigs and rabbits are 10% all together(PETA).This claim comes from an organization which is surprisingly stands against animal testing. The statistic supra shows that animal testing does not damage animals on our planet. Many diseases are being transmitted to humans by these pests like rats. One of the most historically dangerous rat-borne diseases is the bubonic plague, also called Black Plague, and its variants.. fleas transported on rats a re considered responsible for this plague during the Middle Ages, which killed millions(Orkin). It is actually obvious that many people know what happened during the Middle Ages when Black Plague spread over London. It was one of the historical diseases that killed thousands of people, so we can avoid such these devastating diseases by reducing rats numbers simultaneously with getting benefit to our race. Many people think that animal testing does notimprove human health and medicine, and it is only used to develop silly things, such as ordureries. Also, those people think that humans cannot ensure the synthetic rubber of drugs through animal testing because they say that humans do not have completely standardised body to animals. However, those people do not know the fact that is the major pro for animal testing is helping researchers in creating drugs and treatments to improve human health and medicine. Animal testing is very essential to many scientific communities.In fact, t here are many people who stand against animal testing for cosmetic products, but still support animal testing for medicine function. Many medical treatments, especially for cancer and HIV drugs are being found through animal testing (About Animal Testing). These diseases that I listed above are the most severe diseases that humans ever known because they have been suffered from, but through animal testing scientists are making great progress to figure out drugs that can end the calamity of these diseases. Animal testing helps to ensure the safety of drugs and many other substances humans (About Animal Testing). Basically, drugs can deem a great danger to humans if they are used without any assurance of its safety. This means that through animal testing we can prevent the potential danger of drugs simultaneously with saving many human lives.Furthermore, some people think that we cannot ensure the safety of cosmetic products for human uses because humans and animals do not have com pletely similarities outside structure between them which may lead to many mistakes after victimisation these products. However, those people do not look at the details which are the ones that matter. When scientists use animals to test on, they really do not care about the external structure, but they really care about the familiar organs and physical traits. Through animal testing we can test even the first toilet paper in order to know whether these products are safe for human use. Researchers often work with animal models that have biological systems similar to that of a human(Amprogress). This is why scientists use animals as models to test on because the common similarities that humans and animals have.It is really an inevitable fact that even if humans find out new methods of testing, companies will restore animal testing on new products to ensure full safety of any product (cosmeticproduct-europe). Animal testing is an irreplaceable, and without it we can rarely achieve fu ll safety insurance. It is really important to test all cosmetic productson animals because these products are usually chemical products that carry danger with them. In conclusion, I think that animal testing is really needed to improve the quality of societies, and that can be achieved by the results and discoveries of animal testing. Animal testing is a great way to find out how a aliment body reacts to different products which can help us to find out whether these products are safe to be used by humans, so if humans want to develop their communities, animal testing cannot be avoided.Cited organize1-Joey Gruber Tripod, http//joey-gruber.tripod.com/id2.html 2-Peta, http//www.peta.org/search/SearchResults.aspx?q=statistics 3-Orkin, http//www.orkin.com/rodents/rats/rat-borne-diseases/ 4-About animal testing, http//www.aboutanimaltesting.co.uk/using-animals-testing-pros-versus-cons.html 5- Amprogress, http//www.amprogress.org/AnimalResearchFAQ6- Cosmeticproduct-europe, http//www.cos meticsdesign-europe.com/Formulation-Science/L-Oreal-animal-testing-alternatives-vital-but-ensuring-product-safety-is-a-MUST

Simons Stigmata In Lord of the Flies Essay Example for Free

Simons Stigmata In Lord of the Flies EssayIn William Goldings novel, Lord of the Flies, the character Simon portrays legion(predicate) characteristics similar to those demonstrated by messiah in the bible. He is shown to earn altogether the qualities that Jesus has determination, password and resilience. Even his physical appearance portrays Christ since he is skinny and non much of a operose individual. Simon was very take root and caring for others, especially with the little children and enjoyed being alone when he could. Simon embodies a consummate(a) spiritual human rectitude that is deeply connected with nature and people around him as Jesus did with his disciples. Both Jesus and Simon had prophecies ab step forward things to come, and they were both persecuted and were ridiculed of for sharing those prophecies.Whereas Ralph and Jack stand at opposite ends of the surmount between civilization and savagery, Simon stands on an entirely different plane from all th e other boys. Unlike all the other boys on the island, Simon acts with kindness and purity because he believes in the inherent value of morality. He behaves freehearted toward the younger children, and he is the first to realize the problem posed by the beast, that the monster on the island is not real or something that can be hunted down and killed. It isnt physical but rather a savagery that lurks within each human being. In Goldings view, the human impulse toward civilization is not as deeply entrenched as the human impulse toward savagery.Despite the fact that Simon is one of the smallest biguns he never follows the others way of thinking, nor backs down when it comes to speaking up for himself. One such occasion where he shows his defiance of the others beliefs is when he says to everyone, I think we ought to climb the mountain. (page 128) This shows that he knows the beast isnt real and he shows no terror of the unknown. Jesus called people to do things they thought would b e simply impossible just as Simon did, and the fact that not even the stronger boys had the courage to do it shows how assured Simon is to his morals. Simon was sacrificed during the ritual dance so that the other boys could live. Simon was killed by all the boys in an excruciating way and claimed that it wasnt really him. Everyone but Ralph thought that Simon was the beast, and didnt think twice before attacking him. Ralph knew it was Simon they killed, and he realized how everyone was acting like wild creatures.Also the way Simon was shown in the movie after he died showed him as a Christ-figure in the story Simon dies on water that is calm and peaceful, as the light reflected off the water it gave a kind of feeling of holiness. Simons body was carried out by the waves and the way he was floating with his arms stretched out, replicates the way that Jesus died on the cross. Throughout the story, Simon is shown to have a very strong connection with Jesus by his actions of kindness. He displayed as a person with divine ties with Christ and a reminder that purity is everywhere, even when all hopes seem to be gone. The umpteen occurrences Simon gains the courage to speak up and show how smart, intelligent he really is makes a huge carry on on everyone. Simon, like Christ, was never evil and always helped others out with what he could. Simon symbolizes and demonstrates a sort a purity that goes beyond human goodness. However, his brutal murder at the hands of the other boys designates the lack of that goodness in people against an overwhelming abundance of evil that lies deep within each and everyone one of us.

Women of Sparta and Athens Essay Example for Free

Wo workforce of Sparta and Athens EssayThe role of wo hands in Ancient Greece e actually last(predicate) depended on the city where one croakd. In Sparta, women were more valued and respected by men, so the men were willing to give them more rights and opportunities to make their own decisions. In Athens, men had a more traditionalistic view on women and considerd that they shouldnt belong in society so therefore, men primarily monitored the women actions. Sparta lies in the Peloponnesus, in the south. The Spartans set up a brutal and strict system of control. Assemblies make up by male citizens approved the major decisions in Sparta.Since the men of Sparta valued how women looked, beautiful and attractive women were granted more opportunities which eventually led to having more rights. Attraction was what Spartan sight cared well-nigh most. In order to respect the womens beauty, men would inspect the women while they were completely nude. Women had mirrors all over, so th ey were constantly looking at themselves and fixing themselves. They obsessed over their looks and appearances. Once a man was pleased with the woman, he would take her and hook up with her. Men also prized beautiful women and sought them as brides, even breaking some of societys rules to win them. .The people with the best looks were the most respected and noniced by people. In Sparta beautiful people were exceedingly self-esteemed the best-looking man and women were most admired. Women who werent beautiful didnt get chosen by the men to wed, and therefore lived with their pose and barely had any rights and freedom at all. The men solely tie the beautiful women and once you are married you are given much more freedom and rights to live by.The men of Athens believed that the women had a specific role in society. While the men were off qualification decisions, they expected the women to be at home taking care of the children, household, and monitoring the slaves. Courtesans we cargo hold for pleasure, concubines for daily attention upon our person, but wives for the procreation of legitimate children and to be our faithful housekeepers, that is all. (Nardo, 57). The men used poor and lower flesh women for their own pleasure, and they used their wives to take care of the children and to be their personal housekeepers.The focus the men talk virtually their wives is deal they are referring to them as their salves, they dont give them any respect at all. dishful wasnt valued in Athens, it was much more important to be at home and keep it clean while caring for the children and slaves. The women covered their body and were usually by themselves. If they were to ever go out, they had to be accompanied by an escort. The Athenian women werent granted many rights because the men just didnt believe that they should be given rights. They thought it was much more important for the women to be at home watch over the kids, and slaves while keeping the house ti dy.So therefore, the Athenian men didnt prioritize womens rights because they strongly believed that their place was at home. The process that we go by today, a materialization women meeting an eligible young man, falling in love, and deciding to get married-was largely unheard of in Athenian society. The way the Athenian marri maturate process took place was the bride got married off to the husband by her father. The bride was legally incompetent of arranging her own marriage. The purpose of marriage was not for love, rather babies, money, land or what ever the husband and the father of the bride agree on.It wasnt unusual for marriage to take place with man and women not knowing much about each other. The women would mostly get married off for the first time mingled with ages 14 and 18. It didnt matter if the brides were responsible or not, the men would make all the important decisions about the household. For a women must love her husband even when she has been married to an insignificant man and not brace a contest of pride (Lefkowit, 2005). Even if a woman is unhappy in her marriage organisation there is nothing she can do to change it, she cannot leave, or rebel.In Athens, marriage wasnt highly valued the marriages were based solely on the brides father and husbands decisions and deals. The Athenian women did not have any say or opinion on who or when they marry. The husband and father made deals and controlled their marriages completely, while the women were pushed aside with no voice. In Sparta, the man chose a woman who was cross in age who he wished to marry. The marriage remains a secret, and they live apart, until the bride gets pregnant and they can move in together.The brides had to be a responsible and capable bride, because they managed most of the household and children. The women in Sparta largely took precedence over men in that sphere. The Spartan men had to choose their bride wisely, and had to make sure that they were fit to the jo b of discharge the household, and making important decisions. In Athens, the men considered themselves the leaders, and they felt that the only role of a women was to stay at home and watch over it, have babies, and keep the people growing and healthy. The men were the leaders, the women lived in business organisation of the men.They were not allowed to own land under any circumstances. They were not allowed to appear in court. They were not allowed to garnish their own marriage, and they were not allowed to go out of the house by themselves, only accompanied by their father or husband. The men created strict laws that separated them from the women, and told the women but what to do, and how to act. The women were considered only citizens and nothing else they played roles in unearthly festivals, but they had absolutely no real decisions in law or society.In Athens, the men were the leaders, and believed that the women were only good for the little side things, like watching o ver the household, getting pregnant, and keeping the population growing, they did not believe that they were capable for anything else important which is why they were given no real rights. The men of Athens were considered like god and had insane muscle and strength the women were looked at imperfect beings and got pushed aside by the men with no roles to protect them. In Sparta, the women had active roles in the community and specific institutions.In Sparta, unlike in Athens, it was very important to be fit and strong they cared a lot about military training, war and fighting. The women busy in many physical training similar to the train that the men went through, but not as intense. If they were ever needed, the women were capable of stepping in and fighting. The women of Sparta were very outspoken and were not as afraid to stand up to the men, because they were not treated as differently. Women were allowed to own land, even if she had brothers, a women can share the inheritanc e of her father, if she had no brothers, she can inherit all the land.The women were fit, smart, and confident about themselves, therefore more capable of taking on role in society. The Athenian men passed a law that strictly controlled womens social and cozy behavior and limited what the are able to own, and inherit. They had limits on the number of women who could participate in funerals, the women were not allowed to repair tribute to the family of passing (shiva call), and when this was allowed on special circumstances, there was a limit of no more than 5 woman they made a rule that the women were not allowed to leave the tomb before the men at a funeral. imited the amount of women allowed in church, and religious festivals. The purpose of the men strictly restricting the womans rights and limiting exactly what they are and are not allowed to do, was to force them to be at home, producing more child to keep the population flowing, and to watch over the land within the family.